Skip to main content

9/11 - Space & Perception

SDI Video Game & The Twin Towers





Researchers have pointed out connections between 9/11 and some hollywood media.



People call it foreshadowing, or predictive programming, mind control, media exercises, there are many names given to these strange 'predictions'. 

Here are a few games that "predicted" 9/11.




I don't think it matters what you call it. The simple fact is, there is a reason for it.



What is this reason? Warning? Mockery? Manufactured Consent?



There are different theories, and I don't know. However I have noticed that there are some very limited hangouts regarding stuff like this. For instance, many people have pointed out the connections between the film, "Back to the Future" and the events of September 11th. There are plenty of things to point out in the film that seemingly foreshadow 9/11.




However I only know of one person who has pointed out the obvious connection between:
Cold Fusion (LENR) in "Back to the Future" and the other 9/11 connections.





If you have studied the work of Dr. Judy Wood, and Andrew Johnson, then you will be well aware of the effects of Cold Fusion (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions) taking place at the World Trade Center on September 11th 2001 (in particular transmutation and the formation of tritium.) Dis-informers will try to convince you this was caused by something conventional.



This is a lie, and not possible without ionizing radiation. But indeed it is a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction taking place. 

FREE ENERGY!




The 'cold fusion' process went mainstream in the 80's. Thanks to the work of scientists: Martin Fleischmann & Stanley Pons.

Among a few others such as: 
Dr. John Bockris



 There are many more reproducing these effects like Bob Greenyer

http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/facilitators/32-bob-greenyer


Interesting enough this 'breakthrough' is around the same time the "Back to the Future" film was released.



If you would like to learn more about this, then you can visit the website of Carl James - TheTruthSeekersGuide BlogSpot.

http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.com/




You can also watch his in-depth analysis of "Back to the Future - The symbolism & themes of 9/11"

 Runtime is a little under an hour. 100% Worth it.





I wanted to write up a quick piece about this video game I just found. Some may already be aware, there is a video game for the SDI (Star Wars) Program, created by the Reagan Administration.






This video game was created by Activision for Sega.



Both very popular names in the gaming industry.


The reason I feel this is important, is because of the evidence discussed by Dr. Judy Wood.


Dr. Judy Wood has been ridiculed by the mainstream as well as the alternative 'truth' community.


Many people have resorted to name calling, using the common term: 'Space Beamer' to describe her and readers of her book.





I actually think this is very telling. Almost a form of reverse psychology. There is much evidence to support the idea of 'Space-Based Weapons'. Honestly, all you have to do is a little research, which I will leave to the reader this time...








Sci-Fi Films & Video Games have played a huge role in making sure people don't believe in this technology.




I found it very interesting that this video game, about the Strategic Defense Initiative (Star Wars Program) was depicting images of the Twin Towers. 

Even showing New York City under attack.




Is this more of the foreshadowing / predictive programming / media exercising / mind control stuff?



It's noteworthy to mention that the game actually takes place in a time we now live in, check out this screenshot.




The simple fact is: This technology does indeed exist, and was used against us on that horrible day.



Dr. Judy Wood has never once stated that: "The weapon is a beam from space." She has never made any such comments. 

It has been described as 'Field Effects' relating to an energy phenomenon discovered by Canadian researcher / inventor John Hutchinson. 

Like i said that term 'Space Beamer' came from her adversaries and people who continue to oppose the truth. 



The biggest traitor is Steven E. Jones who was also involved in the cold fusion affair in the 80s. Actually he patented a similar process which discredited the work of Martin Fleischmann & Stanley Pons
Now Steven E. Jones is a 9/11 truther, who found 'nano-
thermite' in the WTC dust. 

Coincidence? Click the link below for the full story.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=95&Itemid=60



But why would they use 'Space Beamer'  to discredit someone? Is it because, psychologically, you would imagine a Star Trek Weapon that doesn't actually exist? 

Causing you to ignore evidence like this?
Once again: This technology does indeed exist, and was used against us on that horrible day. 



Please help to stop the nonsense, learn how this technology works and lets try to make sure it doesn't happen again...


...Please read Dr. Judy Wood's book: 
Where did the towers go? Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology on 9/11



Please read Andrew Johnson's book: 911 Finding the Truth and part 2: 911 Holding the Truth




Thank you for taking the time to view this article, and thank you to every human being who has taken the time to understand this technology, and every human who wants to be free, and is doing the work to make it happen. 

AKA: Real Truthers!


I am still promoting Free Energy & Free Thinking for everyone!

- Chris @ Wolf Clan Media


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

9/11 - Phantom Warfare

Energy & Consciousness I'd like to thank Mark Conlon for all his research.  Which made writing this article possible.   There is an overwhelming amount of  evidence that suggests that directed free energy technology was used on 9/11  to destroy the World Trade Center.  Neither bombs or fire can explain the clearly visible evidence in this 3-minute clip... Before you continue reading this article, if you haven't already done so, then please take the time to study this evidence  for yourself.  Phantom Jets  There is also  evidence that suggests the 'airplanes' on 9/11 were actually a product of psychological warfare  through the use of  holography  or some type of  optical illusion  and the 'airplane damage' was caused by a form of directed energy as well.  We have already established through the work of many researchers that the airplanes on 9/11 could not have been the 4 commercial aircraft that we were to

9/11 - Ghost Gun UA-175

Ghost Gun UA175 Holograms, Whistleblowers and the 9/11 Media Hoax Revised 9/11/2005 |  Updates @ bottom | w/radio show Re-posted 4/28/2018 With minor edits and adjustments made by:  Wolf Clan Media I do no agree with the conclusion of "pre-planted explosives" creating the airplane shaped holes in the Twin Towers.  I strongly feel this was done using un-conventional technology. See my article on this ---> http://wolfclanmedia-research.blogspot.com/2018/03/911-phantom-warfare.html Most 9/11 (no-plane) researchers promote falsehoods about the video & photographic evidence from that day. Some highlights of research from 2005 which makes some very great observations and helps to prove that an object was in the sky on 9/11.  Many links are now broken :( Unfortunately, the UA175 illusion (WTC2, morning of 9-11-1) was not 100% successful.   Foreword (by Dr. Stefan Grossmann): I have been asked to describe what the name ‘Ghost Gun’ (as used i

9/11 - Optical Illusions

The Word 'Holograms' & Perception Management   I've included web links for most of my statements. (numerical order) Many documents are available as well. chris@wolfclanentertainment.com Section 1     I'd like to discuss evidence of a technology that exist . This technology has been publicly known since at least 1971.   (1)  However design started obviously much earlier.  (2)  For ordinary citizens this technology is kept in the realm of Science Fiction . For some strange reason we decide to believe that's all it has, & ever will be...  I'm referring to a specific phenomenon, but the public perception of it's reality is not unique to other advanced technologies.  (3)  In other words, people feel this way about many strange things that do indeed exist.  (4)  Obviously there is a psychological aspect to this. Otherwise such words as 'Holograms' would not be so laughable when discussed publicly.  While we are briefly on the subject of